% !TeX spellcheck = en_US
\documentclass[xcolor=x11names,compress,11pt,aspectratio=169]{beamer}
\usepackage{etex}
% Paquetes esenciales
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{overpic}
%% General document %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\usepackage{graphicx}
%\usepackage[dvipsnames]{xcolor}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usetikzlibrary{decorations.fractals,tikzmark,decorations.pathreplacing,calligraphy}
\usepackage{subcaption}
\usepackage{xspace}
\usepackage{transparent}
\usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos}

\usepackage{tcolorbox}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\usepackage{array}
\usepackage{colortbl}
\usepackage{heppennames2}
\tcbuselibrary{skins}

\hypersetup{colorlinks,linkcolor=,urlcolor=DeepSkyBlue4}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\let\oldhref\href
\renewcommand{\href}[2]{\oldhref{#1}{\bfseries#2}}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

%\includeonlyframes{theframe}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%


\usepackage[super]{nth}


\newif\ifplacelogo % create a new conditional
\placelogotrue % set it to true
\logo{\ifplacelogo\includegraphics[width=.08\textwidth]{figs//logo.png}\vspace*{.79\paperheight}\fi}

%% Beamer Layout %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\useoutertheme[subsection=false,shadow]{miniframes}
\useinnertheme{default}
%\usefonttheme{serif}
\usepackage{palatino}

%%pauqetes metidos por mi
\usepackage{lscape}
\usepackage{rotating}%rotar tablas
\usepackage{graphicx}%escalar tablas
\usepackage{multirow,array}%tablas tamaño celdas con texto centrado
\usepackage{gensymb}%para los grados celsius
\usepackage{float}  %para imponer posiciones de las imagenes
\usepackage{pdfpages} %para añadir imagenes pdf
\usepackage{multicol}%para usar multicolumnas

\def\permille{\ensuremath{{}^\text{o}\mkern-5mu/\mkern-3mu_\text{oo}}}

\setbeamerfont{title like}{shape=\scshape}
\setbeamerfont{frametitle}{shape=\scshape}

\setbeamercolor*{lower separation line head}{bg=black} 
\setbeamercolor*{normal text}{fg=black,bg=white} 
\setbeamercolor*{alerted text}{fg=red} 
\setbeamercolor*{example text}{fg=black} 
\setbeamercolor*{structure}{fg=black} 
\usepackage{transparent}
%\setbeamertemplate{blocks}[rounded][shadow=true]
\setbeamertemplate{blocks}[rounded][shadow=true]
\setbeamercolor{block body}{bg=gray!10!white!100}
\setbeamercolor{block title}{fg=white,bg=DeepSkyBlue4!60!black}

\setbeamercolor{block body example}{fg=white,bg=DeepSkyBlue4!60!black}
\setbeamercolor{block title example}{fg=white,bg=DeepSkyBlue4!60!black}

\setbeamercolor{block body alert}{parent=normal text,use=block title,bg=block title.bg!10!bg}
\setbeamercolor{block title alert}{fg=red,bg=red!60!white}
\setbeamercolor{alerted text}{fg=black}


\setbeamercolor*{palette tertiary}{fg=black,bg=black!10} 
\setbeamercolor*{palette quaternary}{fg=black,bg=black!10} 

\renewcommand{\(}{\begin{columns}}
\renewcommand{\)}{\end{columns}}
\newcommand{\<}[1]{\begin{column}{#1}}
	\renewcommand{\>}{\end{column}}

%\spanishdecimal{.}
\setbeamertemplate{navigation symbols}{}

\tcbset{tab2/.style={enhanced,fonttitle=\bfseries,fontupper=\normalsize\sffamily,
		colback=white,colframe=black,colbacktitle=DeepSkyBlue4!60!black,
		coltitle=white,center title}}

\newcolumntype{s}{>{\hsize=.7\hsize}X}
\newcolumntype{Y}{>{\hsize=1.2\hsize}X}

% Comandos cortos

%\usepackage{cancel}
\usepackage{slashed}
%\usepackage{braket}
\usepackage{ptdr-definitions}
\newcommand\resal[1]{\textcolor{DeepSkyGreen4}{#1}}

\newcommand\mypar{\par\vspace{\baselineskip}}	% Espaciado
\def\sen{\mathop{\rm sen}\nolimits}		% Función "sen" en texto recto.


%\definecolor{mycolor}{RGB}{255,255,255}
%\tcbset{colframe=white,colback=white,nobeforeafter}

\colorlet{shadecolor}{orange!15}


\definecolor{applegreen}{rgb}{0.55, 0.71, 0.0}

\newcommand{\blue}[1]{\textcolor{DeepSkyBlue4}{#1}}
\newcommand{\green}[1]{\textcolor{applegreen}{#1}}

\def\sectionname{Section}
\AtBeginSection{\frame{\sectionpage}}

\definecolor{mycolor}{RGB}{5,61,245}

\setbeamercovered{transparent}

\defbeamertemplate*{footline}{shadow theme}
{%
	\leavevmode%
	\hbox{\begin{beamercolorbox}[wd=\paperwidth,ht=2.5ex,dp=1.125ex,leftskip=.3cm plus1fil,rightskip=.3cm]{author in head/foot}%
			\usebeamerfont{author in head/foot}Page \insertframenumber\hfill\insertshortauthor
		\end{beamercolorbox}%
	}
	\vskip0pt%
}


\makeatletter
\let\beamer@writeslidentry@miniframeson=\beamer@writeslidentry
\def\beamer@writeslidentry@miniframesoff{%
	\expandafter\beamer@ifempty\expandafter{\beamer@framestartpage}{}% does not happen normally
	{%else
		% removed \addontents commands
		\clearpage\beamer@notesactions%
	}
}
\newcommand*{\miniframeson}{\let\beamer@writeslidentry=\beamer@writeslidentry@miniframeson}
\newcommand*{\miniframesoff}{\let\beamer@writeslidentry=\beamer@writeslidentry@miniframesoff}
\makeatother

\def\Put(#1,#2)#3{\leavevmode\makebox(0,0){\put(#1,#2){#3}}}

\title{   }

\author[]{}

%\institute{} 


\newcommand\Wider[2][3em]{%
	\makebox[\linewidth][c]{%
		\begin{minipage}{\dimexpr\textwidth+#1\relax}
			\raggedright#2
		\end{minipage}%
	}%
}

\newcommand<>{\uncovergraphics}[2][{}]{
	% Taken from: <https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/354033/95423>
	\begin{tikzpicture}
	\node[anchor=south west,inner sep=0] (B) at (4,0)
	{\includegraphics[#1]{#2}};
	\onslide#3{}{%
		\fill [draw=none, fill=white, fill opacity=0.7] (B.north west) -- (B.north east) -- (B.south east) -- (B.south west) -- (B.north west) -- cycle;
	}
	\end{tikzpicture}
}

\input{\string~/cernbox/tesis/inputs/aliases.tex}

\begin{document}
	{
		\bgroup
	
		\begin{frame}[plain]{}
		%	\makeatletter 
		%	\setbeamertemplate{headline}[default] 
		%	\def\beamer@entrycode{\vspace*{-1\headheight}}
		%	\makeatother
		%		
		%	\setbeamertemplate{footline}{} 
		%	\begin{frame}{} 
		
					\vspace{-1cm}
		
		
		

			%		\column{0.01\textwidth}
					
					\vspace{2ex}
					
			\begin{center}
			
			\begin{columns}
				\column{0.6\textwidth}
					\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/model_schematic_2.png}
				
				\column{0.3\textwidth}
					\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/LogoSimpleVec.pdf}
		
			\end{columns}
		
		\end{center}
				
				\vspace{-1cm}
				
			\begin{center}
				
				
			\textrm{\textsc{\large Tesis doctoral}}

			\vspace{2ex}	
				
				\hrule 
			\vspace{2ex}	
			\textrm{\large Búsqueda de nueva física en eventos con leptones de alto momento transverso con el detector CMS del LHC}

						\vspace{2ex}	
						
			\hrule 
			\vspace{2ex}
						\textrm{\large Search for new physics in events with high transverse momentum leptons with the CMS detector at the LHC}
			\vspace{2ex}	
			\hrule 


			
						\end{center}
			
		

		\vspace{2ex}
				
			
			\textrm{\large{\textbf{Autor:} Sergio S\'anchez Cruz}}

			\vspace{1ex}
						
			\textrm{\large{\textbf{Director:} Dr. Javier Cuevas Maestro} \hfill Oviedo, 11 de septiembre, 2020}
		
		
		

		%	\vspace{2.4cm}
		
		%		\hspace{-0.5\textwidth}
		%			\begin{columns}
		%					\column{0.3\textwidth}
		%					{					\small 
		%					7 September 2016}
		%					
		%					\column{0.14\textwidth}
		%					
		%					\column{0.5\textwidth}
		%					{ \small 
		%					Taller de Altas Energ\'ias (Benasque) }
		%			\end{columns}
		
		\vspace{-5mm}

	\end{frame}

	
	
}

\begin{frame}{}
	
\begin{itemize}
	\item Exploring physics at the highest energy available in colliders
\end{itemize}
\begin{overlayarea}{\textwidth}{\textheight}
	\only<1>{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/scheme.pdf}}
	\only<2>{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/scheme_inv.pdf}}
\end{overlayarea}
% aim to explore physics at the highest energy scale available
% top physics, higgs (electroweak) physics, bsm sectors
% en gran parte de los casos hay leptones porque se desintegran a traves de bosones W y Z 

\end{frame}






\begin{frame}
% tirarse un poco mas el rollo de lo importante que es estudiar estas cosas

\blue{Contribution to the CMS detector operation}

\begin{itemize}
	\item Developments in the trigger system
	\item Contribution to the muon object group
\end{itemize}

\blue{Top quark physics: \ttbar and \tW}

\begin{itemize}
	\item Benchmark for SM studies in hadron colliders
	\item Study of perturbative QCD
	\item Background for BSM searches
\end{itemize}

\blue{Searches for supersymmetric particles}

\begin{itemize}
	\item Exploring events with opposite-sign same-flavor lepton pair
	\item Particularly interesting for electroweak produced SUSY
\end{itemize}

\blue{Studies of the Higgs boson properties: \ttH and \tHq production}
\begin{itemize}
	\item Exploring the most sensitive channel in Run 2 $\Rightarrow$ multilepton final states
	\item Allow to explore the top Yukawa sector
\end{itemize}

\end{frame}


\begin{frame}{Outline}
	
	\begin{itemize}
		\item Experimental set-up: LHC and the CMS detector
		\item Measurement of the inclusive and differential \tW production cross sections
		\item Search for SUSY in events with opposite-charge same-flavor leptons
		\item Measurement of \ttH and \tHq production in the multilepton channel
		\item Conclusions
	\end{itemize}
	
\end{frame}

\AtBeginSection{}

\section[LHC and CMS]{Experimental set-up: LHC and the CMS detector}
\subsection{title}



\begin{frame}{} 


\begin{center}
	\begin{large}
		Section 1\\ \vspace{6pt}
		Experimental set-up: LHC and the CMS detector
	\end{large}
\end{center}

\begin{center}
	\includegraphics[width=0.83\textwidth]{figs/Hmm_display.png}
\end{center}

\vspace{-0.1cm}



\begin{columns}
	\column{0.1\textwidth}
	\column{0.4\textwidth}
\begin{itemize}
	\item CMS-DP-2019-026
	\item CMS-DP-2019-022
\end{itemize}

	\column{0.4\textwidth}
\begin{itemize}
	\item CMS-DP-2918-042
\end{itemize}
		\column{0.1\textwidth}

\end{columns}


\end{frame}


\begin{frame}{Large Hadron Collider}
	% hablar del lhc 
	%    energia de colision, luminosidad instantanea
	%    periodos de data taking, pile-up
	%    


	\begin{columns}
		\column{0.35\textwidth} 
			\Wider{ 
		\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/lhc_pic.jpg}
}

	\begin{itemize}
		\item Superb performance of the LHC during Run 2 
	\end{itemize}

		\column{0.02\textwidth} 

		\column{0.7\textwidth} 

			\begin{itemize}
				\item Delivering pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV during Run 2 (2015-2018)
				\item Peak luminosity of 2$\cdot 10^{34}\mathrm{cm}^{-2}\mathrm{s}^{-1}$ 
				\item Average of 30-40 interactions per bunch crossing during Run 2
				\item Running conditions evolving in data taking periods
			\end{itemize}		

		\vspace{-0.1cm}

		\begin{columns}[onlytextwidth]
		\column{0.5\textwidth}
		\includegraphics[width=1.05\textwidth]{figs/int_lumi_allcumulative_pp_run2_cutout.pdf}
		
		\column{0.5\textwidth}
		\includegraphics[width=1.05\textwidth]{figs/pileup_allYears_run2.pdf}	
				\end{columns}
	



	\end{columns}

\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{CMS detector} 
	\Wider{ 
	\begin{columns}[onlytextwidth]
	\column{0.58\textwidth}
	\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/cms_160312_06.pdf}

	\column{0.42\textwidth}
	
	\begin{itemize}
		\item High resolution tracker detector
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Enhanced with a new layer
		\end{itemize}
		\item Intense magnetic field
		\item Muon system with good coverage
		\item Hermetic calorimeters
		\item Efficient triggering system
	\end{itemize}

\begin{block}{}
		\begin{itemize}
		\item Excellent performance of the detector
		\item Data taking efficiency of 93.4\%
		\item More than 1000 articles released 
	\end{itemize}

\end{block}	
	\column{0.01\textwidth}	
	\end{columns}
}
	% cms, general purpose experiment, brief description
\end{frame}

\placelogofalse




\placelogofalse

\begin{frame}{CMS object performance} 
	% tracking resolution, ecal, algo del sistema de muones
	\Wider{ 
	


	\begin{textblock*}{0.02\textwidth}(0.36\textwidth,0.6\textheight)
	\begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
		\begin{exampleblock}{}
			\begin{center}
				\rotatebox{90}{\textbf{ \tiny JINST 14.07 (2019), P07004}}
			\end{center}
		\end{exampleblock}
	\end{minipage}
\end{textblock*}

	\begin{textblock*}{0.02\textwidth}(0.36\textwidth,0.2\textheight)
	\begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
		\begin{exampleblock}{}
			\begin{center}
				\rotatebox{90}{\textbf{ \tiny CMS-DP-2018-058}}
			\end{center}
		\end{exampleblock}
	\end{minipage}
\end{textblock*}



	\begin{textblock*}{0.02\textwidth}(0.7\textwidth,0.2\textheight)
	\begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
		\begin{exampleblock}{}
			\begin{center}
				\rotatebox{90}{\textbf{ \tiny CMS-DP-2018-042}}
			\end{center}
		\end{exampleblock}
	\end{minipage}
\end{textblock*}

\begin{textblock*}{0.02\textwidth}(0.7\textwidth,0.65\textheight)
	\begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
		\begin{exampleblock}{}
			\begin{center}
				\rotatebox{90}{\textbf{ \tiny CMS-DP-2020-024}}
			\end{center}
		\end{exampleblock}
	\end{minipage}
\end{textblock*}

	
		\begin{columns}[onlytextwidth]

	

		\column{0.3\textwidth} 
			\begin{block}{Object reconstruction}

			\begin{itemize}
				\item Particle flow algorithm
				\item Dedicated algorithms
			\end{itemize}
		
		
			\begin{itemize}
				\item Excellent object performance across the Run 2 data-taking
			\end{itemize}

			\end{block}

		\column{0.01\textwidth} 

		\column{0.3\textwidth} 
	
		
		\vspace{-0.15cm}
	

		\begin{overpic}[width=\textwidth]{figs/SF_30GeV.pdf}
			\put(12,18){\tiny \colorbox{white}{\blue{Flavor tagging} }}
			\put(12,10){\tiny \colorbox{white}{\blue{performance}}}
		\end{overpic} 

		\vspace{-0.04cm}

		\begin{overpic}[width=\textwidth]{figs/CMS-JME-17-001_Figure_007-a.pdf}
			\put(50,60){\tiny \blue{\ptmiss resolution}}
		\end{overpic} 
	
		\column{0.28\textwidth}
				\vspace{-0.6cm} 

		\begin{overpic}[width=\textwidth]{figs/egm_mee.png}
			\put(15,50){\tiny \blue{Electron} }
			\put(15,45){\tiny \blue{resolution} }
		\end{overpic} 


			\begin{overpic}[width=\textwidth]{plots/muon/TnP_MC_NUM_TightID_DEN_genTracks_PAR_eta_.pdf}
				\put(20,35){\tiny \blue{ Muon efficiency} }
		\end{overpic} 


		\end{columns}
}
\end{frame}



\placelogofalse

\begin{frame}{Muon reconstruction}
	
	
	\begin{columns}
		
	\column{0.4\textwidth} 
	\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/CMSslice_whiteBackground.png}
		

	\column{0.6\textwidth} 
	
		\vspace{-2.2cm}
	
	\begin{itemize}
		\item Muon reconstruction combines information from tracker and muon system
		\item Efficiency higher than 99\%
		\item Quality criteria applied targeting different levels of purity and muon sources
	\end{itemize}


	\end{columns}

	\begin{columns}
		
	\column{0.6\textwidth} 

	\vspace{-0.6cm}
	

	\begin{block}{}
	\begin{itemize}
		\item Coordinated the \blue{muon selection and calibration group} (L3 responsibility)
		\item Developed the \blue{\ttH lepton MVA} for wider use in the collaboration
		\item Contributed to \blue{identification developments in Run 3 }
	\end{itemize}
	\end{block}

	\column{0.4\textwidth} 
	
	\vspace{-1.6cm}
	
		\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/eff_pt_ttH_muon_2016_2lss.png}

	\end{columns}

\end{frame}
\begin{frame}{Trigger system}

\begin{textblock*}{0.2\textwidth}(0.45\textwidth,0.1\textheight)
	\begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
		\begin{exampleblock}{}
			\begin{center}
				\textbf{  \tiny CMS-TRG-19-001 }
			\end{center}
		\end{exampleblock}
	\end{minipage}
\end{textblock*}

\begin{textblock*}{0.13\textwidth}(0.95\textwidth,0.25\textheight)
	\begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
	\begin{exampleblock}{}
		\begin{center}
			\textbf{\tiny CMS-DP-2019-026}
		\end{center}
	\end{exampleblock}
\end{minipage}
\end{textblock*}

\Wider{ 
	\begin{columns}
		\column{0.01\textwidth} 
		\column{0.7\textwidth} 
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Trigger system to keep acceptance rate under control
			\vspace{0.2cm}
			\begin{itemize}
				\item L1  $\Rightarrow$ built in hardware,\\ coarse readout of  calorimeters and muon system
				\item HLT $\Rightarrow$ software-based, full detector readout
			\end{itemize}
		\end{itemize}
	
	\begin{block}{}
		
		\blue{L1 trigger}
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Contributed to the developments of the \blue{OMTF for the Phase-II upgrade}
		\end{itemize}
		
		\blue{HLT}
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Coordinated the \blue{trigger effort in the top physics} group
			\item Participated in the \blue{development of trigger paths} used in dilepton, single lepton and fully hadronic top and Higgs physics analyses
		\end{itemize}
	
		\end{block}

		
		
		\column{0.3\textwidth} 
		\vspace{-0.7cm}
		
		\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/ele_pt_ele28_ht150_OR_ele32_vs_ele32_data_2017.pdf}
		
		\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/ele_pt_ele30_jet35_OR_ele32_vs_ele32_data_2018.pdf}
		
	\end{columns}
}
\end{frame}

\placelogotrue

\AtBeginSection{}

\section[Top physics]{Measurement of the \tW production cross sections}
\subsection{title}

\begin{frame}{} 
	

	\begin{center}
	\begin{large}
		Section 2\\ \vspace{6pt}
		Measurement of the \tW inclusive and differential production cross sections
	\end{large}
	\end{center}

	\begin{center}
		\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{figs/display_tw.png}
	\end{center}

	\begin{itemize}
	\item \ttbar production [7, 8 TeV]. JHEP 08 (2016) 029
	\item \ttbar production [13 TeV, 2016]. EPJC 79 (2019) 368
	\item \blue{\tW production [13 TeV, 2016]. JHEP 10 (2018) 117}
	\item \blue{\tW differential [13 TeV, 2016]. CMS-PAS-TOP-19-003}
	\end{itemize}

	\Put(200,200){ \includegraphics[width=0.53\textwidth]{figs/tw_briefing.png}}

\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Study of {\normalfont \tW} production}

	\begin{columns}
		\column{0.7\textwidth} 

	\begin{itemize}
		\item Second-largest single top production mode at the LHC
		\item Observed at 8 \TeV by CMS ({\footnotesize PRL 112 (2014) 231802}) and ATLAS ({\footnotesize 		JHEP 01 (2016) 064})
		\item Entering the precision regime
	\end{itemize}

	\begin{itemize}
			\item Provides sensitivity to  the $V_{\PQt\PQb}$ vertex
			\item Closely related to \ttbar measurements
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Interference between processes at NLO 
		\end{itemize}

	\end{itemize}

		\column{0.3\textwidth} 
		
		\vspace{-0.6cm}
		
		\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/CMS-TOP-17-018_Figure_001-a.pdf}
		
		\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/CMS-TOP-17-018_Figure_001-b.pdf}
		
	\column{0.01\textwidth} 
	\end{columns}	


	
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{{\normalfont \tW-\ttbar} interference}
\Wider{ 
	\begin{columns}
		\column{0.4\textwidth} 

	\begin{itemize}
		\item Overlapping diagrams between the two processes at NLO
		\item Different ad-hoc approaches to tackle interference
		\item Full NLO calculation exists in \POWHEG\ {\footnotesize (arXiv:1607.04538)}
	\end{itemize}

		\column{0.6\textwidth} 

\begin{center}
	\begin{overpic}[width=\textwidth]{figs/ttbar_tw.png}
		\put(20,-5){ \color{red} Doubly resonant } 
		\put(60,-5){ \color{red} Singly resonant } 
	\end{overpic}
	
\end{center}
\vspace{0.1cm}

\begin{center}
	$ |\mathcal{A}_{WWbb}|^2 = |\mathcal{A}_{tt}|^2 + |\mathcal{A}_{tWb}|^2 + 2\text{Re}\lbrace \mathcal{A}_{tt}^* \mathcal{A}_{tWb} \rbrace $ 
\end{center}
	\end{columns}

	% por que es importante hacer tW physics
	% explicar que fue observado a 8 tev, y tal, precision physics
	
	\begin{itemize}
		\item Interference not dominant in the bulk of \ttbar and \tW studies
		\item Significant source of uncertainty in BSM searches or boosted regimes
	\end{itemize}
	
}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Event selection}
	% closely related to ttbar measurements (top-17-001), since it is the same topology
	% mostrar njet, nbjet y las categories
	
	\begin{columns}
		
		\column{0.5\textwidth}
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Selecting events with an $\Pepm\PGmmp$ pair
			\item Jet and \PQb-tagged jet multiplicity to discriminate signal and backgrounds
			\item Three regions of interest defined: 1j1b, 2j1b, 2j2b
		\end{itemize}
		
		
				\column{0.5\textwidth}
		\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{plots/tw/Figure_003-a.pdf}
		
		
	
	\end{columns}
	

	
\end{frame}



\placelogofalse
\begin{frame}{Multivariate discriminators}

	\Wider{ 
	\begin{columns}
		\column{0.6\textwidth} 
		
		\vspace{-0.6cm}
					
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Make use of BDTs to discriminate signal from \ttbar background
			\item Different features exploited in each ROI
		\end{itemize}

		\vspace{-.1cm}
		
		\blue{1j1b region}
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Profit from one missing jet in \ttbar events
			\item Number of low energy jets, total boost of the system, ...
		\end{itemize}
		
		\vspace{-.1cm}
		
		\blue{2j1b region}
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Softer second jet in signal events
			\item Higher energy in the \ttbar system 
		\end{itemize}
	
		\blue{2j2b region}
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Negligible contribution of signal, no BDT used
			\item Kinematic variable to constrain \ttbar
		\end{itemize}
		\column{0.37\textwidth} 

\vspace{-0.6cm}

	\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{plots/tw/overtrain_1j1t}

	\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{plots/tw/overtrain_2j1t}

		
	\end{columns}
}
\end{frame}


\begin{frame}{Signal extraction}

	\begin{columns}
		\column{0.68\textwidth} 
			\vspace{-0.5cm}
		\begin{block}{}
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Signal cross section determined by performing ML fit to distributions of BDT and sub-leading jet \pt
			\item Systematic uncertainties treated as nuisance parameters
			\item $\sigma_{\PQt\PW} = 63.1 \pm 1.8\ \mathrm{(stat)} \pm 6.3\ \mathrm{(syst)} \pm 2.1\ \mathrm{(lumi)}\ \mathrm{pb}$
			\item Consistent with aNNLO calculations: 
		\end{itemize}

		\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ $ \sigma_{\PQt\PW}^{\text{SM}}$ =  71.7 $\pm$ 1.8 (scale) $\pm$ 3.4 (PDF) pb 
		
		\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ {\footnotesize (arXiv:1506.04072)}
		\end{block}
	
		\vspace{-0.3cm}
		
		\begin{block}{}
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Accuracy of 11\% 
			\begin{itemize}
				\item Dominated by experimental uncertainties
				\item Lumi (3.3\%), pile-up (3.3\%), ele. eff. (3.2\%), ...
			\end{itemize}
			\item Most precise measurement up to date
		\end{itemize}
		\end{block}

		
		\column{0.4\textwidth} 

		\vspace{-0.6cm}

			\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{plots/CMS-TOP-17-018_Figure_005-a}

			\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{plots/CMS-TOP-17-018_Figure_005-b}



	\end{columns}

	
		
\end{frame}

\placelogotrue

\begin{frame}

	\vspace{0.1cm}

	\begin{center}
		\includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{figs/singletop_allchannels_sep19.pdf}
	\end{center}

\end{frame}


\begin{frame}{Differential measurement}
\Wider{ 
	\begin{columns}
		\column{0.5\textwidth}
			\begin{itemize}
				\item Complementary strategy to the inclusive measurement approach
				\item Using events in the 1j1b region with no low energy jets
				\begin{itemize}
					\item Defines the fiducial region
				\end{itemize}
			\end{itemize}
		
			\begin{itemize}
				\item Results extrapolated to particle level with matrix inversion
			\end{itemize}
			
		\column{0.5\textwidth}
			\vspace{0.2cm}
			\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{plots/tw/Figure_003-b.pdf}
		
	\end{columns}
}
\end{frame}

\placelogofalse

\begin{frame}{Results of differential measurement}

	\begin{columns}
		\column{0.78\textwidth}
		\begin{columns}
			\column{0.02\textwidth} 
			\column{0.55\textwidth} 
		\begin{itemize}
			\item 6 variables of interest studied
			\item Quantities measured at particle level	
			\item 20-100\% accuracy depending on the measured bin
		\end{itemize} 

		\column{0.48\textwidth}
	
		\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{plots/tw/differential/LeadingLepPt_var.pdf}
	
	
		\end{columns}
		
		\begin{itemize}

			\item First CMS \tW differential measurement
			\begin{itemize}
				\item Using  2016 data
			\end{itemize}
			\item Overall compatibility of data with the explored models
		\end{itemize}
		
		\column{0.02\textwidth}
		\column{0.3\textwidth} 
		\vspace{-0.6cm}
		
		\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{plots/tw/differential/LeadingLepPt_fiducialnorm.pdf}
		\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{plots/tw/differential/LeadingLepPtuncertainties_fiducialnorm.pdf}
		
	\end{columns}


\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Prospects for {\normalfont \tW} measurements}

	\Wider{ 

	\begin{itemize}
		\item Performed measurements set the first steps for precision studies of \tW production
	\end{itemize}

	
	\blue{Almost four times luminosity collected at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV}

	\begin{itemize}
		\item Explore the possibility of increasing precision
		\item Measurement not statistics-limited, but
		\item Limited by experimental uncertainties: luminosity, leptons, ... $\Leftarrow$ \blue{can be improved}
	\end{itemize}

	\blue{\ttbar-\tW interference measurements}
	\begin{itemize}
		\item Already explored by the ATLAS Collaboration {(\footnotesize PRL 121, 152002 (2018))}
		\item Perform differential measurements in phase spaces enriched in off-shell top quarks
	\end{itemize}


	

}

\end{frame}


\placelogotrue
\section[Search for SUSY]{Search for SUSY in events with opposite-charge same-flavor leptons}
\subsection{title}


\begin{frame}{} 


\begin{center}
	\begin{large}
		Section 3\\ \vspace{6pt}
		Search for SUSY in events with opposite-sign same-flavor leptons
	\end{large}
\end{center}

\begin{center}
	\includegraphics[width=0.65\textwidth]{figs/display_edge.png}
\end{center}

\begin{itemize}
	\item OSSF lepton SUSY [2015]. JHEP 12 (2016) 013
	\item OSSF lepton SUSY [2016]. JHEP 03 (2018) 076
	\item EWK combination [2016]. JHEP 03 (2018) 160
	\item \blue{OSSF lepton SUSY [Run 2]. CMS-PAS-SUS-20-001}
\end{itemize}


	\Put(-30,350){ \rotatebox{-20}{\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{figs/edge_briefing.png}}}


\end{frame}


\begin{frame}{Introduction}
	% contexto general de las busquedas de susy
	\Wider{ 
	\begin{columns}[onlytextwidth]
		\column{0.6\textwidth} 

	
	\begin{itemize}
		\item Wide program of SUSY searches in the LHC experiments
		\item Motivated by natural SUSY 
		\item Mainly driven by simplified scenarios  that allow to
		\begin{itemize}
			\item optimize searches in specific topologies
			\item set upper limits on production and decay rate of SUSY particles
		\end{itemize}
	\end{itemize}

	\begin{itemize}
		\item Run 1 and early Run 2 searches do not show sign of new physics
		\item Full Run 2 analyses can set stringent limits on most SUSY models
	\end{itemize}

		\column{0.4\textwidth} 
	\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/T2tt_limits_summary_cms.png}



\end{columns}

}

\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Targeted topology} 


	\begin{columns}
		\column{0.6\textwidth} 

	\begin{itemize}
		\item Two opposite-charge same-flavor leptons
		\begin{itemize}
			\item \PZ's in sparticles decay chains
			\item Neutralino three-body-decay
			\item Slepton pair production
		\end{itemize}
		\item Significant \ptmiss 
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Predicted by R-parity conserving models
		\end{itemize}
	\end{itemize}


		\column{0.4\textwidth} 
		
			\begin{overpic}[width=\textwidth]{figs/diagram_decays.pdf}
				\put(32,20){ \footnotesize \PSl} 
				\put(32,36){ \footnotesize $\bar{\PSl}$} 
				\put(60,40){ \footnotesize \Pl} 
				\put(60,15){ \footnotesize $\bar{\Pl}$} 
				\put(60,22){ \footnotesize \PSGczDo} 
				\put(60,36){ \footnotesize \PSGczDo} 
				\put(5,22){ \footnotesize p} 
				\put(5,36){ \footnotesize p} 
				\put(5,50){ \footnotesize \PSGczDt} 
				\put(5,74){ \footnotesize \PSGczDt} 
				\put(40,88){ \footnotesize $\PZ/\PGg^*$} 
				\put(60,50){ \footnotesize \PSGczDo} 
				\put(60,74){ \footnotesize \PSGczDo} 
				\put(69,94){ \footnotesize $\Pl$} 
				\put(69,85){ \footnotesize $\bar{\Pl}$}
				\put(28,60){ \footnotesize $\Pl$} 
				\put(45,60){ \footnotesize $\bar{\Pl}$}

			\end{overpic} 
	\end{columns}


\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{}
	\Wider{ 


	\begin{columns}[onlytextwidth]
		\column{0.7\textwidth} 
			\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/edge_diagram_table.pdf}
		\column{0.3\textwidth} 
		
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Targeting different topologies, due to different initial states
			\item Dedicated signal regions developed for each one
			\item Common background estimation methods 
		\end{itemize}
	
	\end{columns}
}
	% historia del analisis
		% hay que transmitir la idea de que este analisis se ha ido mejorando desde el run 1 y que yo lo hago desde el run 2 
	% 	varias topologias
		% -> el edge mola para casos en los cuales se observa susy facilmente y permite las masas
		% -> on-Z permite estudiar electroweak physics
		% -> slepton es electroweak tambien, hasta el run 2 del lhc estaban basicamente sin explorar
\end{frame}

% quiza entre estas dos (anterior y siguiente), hacer un esquema de todas las topologias y hacer 3 diapositivas en total
 
\begin{frame}{Background estimation} 
	% explicar un poco la idea general de analisis
	%    como se construyen las regiones de senyal (decir cuales son tambien)
	%    los tipos de fondos que va a haber
	%    decir que se hacen data driven
	
	\begin{itemize}
		\item Ad-hoc background estimation methods, developed during Run 1 
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Data-driven when possible
		\end{itemize}
	\end{itemize}
	
	
	\blue{Flavor-symmetric backgrounds}
	
	\begin{itemize}
		\item Dominated by \ttbar, but contributions from $\PW\PW$
		\item Using different-flavor sideband to estimate contributions in the signal region
		\item Differences between electron and muon efficiencies are corrected
	\end{itemize}

	\blue{Instrumental \ptmiss}
	
	\begin{itemize}
		\item Dominated by jet energy mismeasurements
		\item Distribution obtained in a $\PGg+$jets sample
	\end{itemize}

	\begin{itemize}
		\item Slepton region $\Rightarrow$ \dyjets estimated from \PZ peak
	\end{itemize}
	
	\blue{\znu processes}
	\begin{itemize}
		\item Low cross-section but relevant in the tails
		\item Estimated with MC simulations, validated in control regions
	\end{itemize}
	
\end{frame}

\placelogofalse

\begin{frame}{Slepton search} 
% results sleptons (hablar como es cada region, resultados e interpretacion)
	\Wider{ 
	
	\begin{columns}
		\column{0.02\textwidth}
		\column{0.45\textwidth}
			\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{plots/susy/sleptons}
			
			\begin{itemize}
				\item Limited amount of hadronic activity
				\item Requirements on \ptmiss and \mttwol
				\item Lepton pairs outside the \PZ peak
				\item Categories with: 
				\begin{itemize}
					\item No jets
					\item With ISR jets
				\end{itemize}
			\end{itemize}
			
			
		\column{0.25\textwidth}
		

		
			\includegraphics[width=1.05\textwidth]{plots/susy/results/offz/sleptonResults_SRSleptonNoJetOffZ.pdf}
			
			\includegraphics[width=1.05\textwidth]{plots/susy/results/offz/sleptonResults_SRSleptonOneJetOffZ.pdf}
			
		\column{0.35\textwidth}
		
					\vspace{-0.8cm}
			\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{plots/susy/results/TSleptonXSEC.pdf}
		
							\vspace{-0.2cm}
			\begin{itemize}
				\item Agreement with SM prediction
				\item Excluding slepton masses up to 700 \GeV
				\item Exclusion reach extended by 200 \GeV
			\end{itemize}
					\column{0.05\textwidth}
	\end{columns}

}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Electroweak production} 
	% results electroweak (hablar como es cada region, resultados e interpretacion)
	
		\Wider{ 
		
		\begin{columns}
			\column{0.02\textwidth}
			\column{0.45\textwidth}
			\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{plots/susy/TChiWZ.pdf}
			
			\begin{itemize}
				\item \PZ boson in the final state
				\item Hadronic \PW decay
				\item Categories with: 
				\begin{itemize}
					\item Resolved \PW decay
					\item Boosted \PW candidate
				\end{itemize}
			\end{itemize}
			
			
			\column{0.25\textwidth}
			
			\vspace{-0.5cm}
			
			\includegraphics[width=1.05\textwidth]{plots/susy/results/onz/onZResults_SRVZResolved}
			
			\includegraphics[width=1.05\textwidth]{plots/susy/results/onz/onZResults_SRVZBoosted.pdf}
			
			\column{0.35\textwidth}

			\vspace{-0.8cm}
			\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{plots/susy/results/TChiWZ_Exclusion_13TeV.pdf}
			
			\vspace{-0.2cm}
			
			\begin{itemize}
				\item Agreement with SM prediction
				\item Excluding chargino masses up to 750 \GeV
				\item Exclusion reach extended by 100 \GeV
			\end{itemize}
			\column{0.05\textwidth}
		\end{columns}
		
	}
	
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Search for an edge} 
	% results edge (hablar como es cada region, resultados e interpretacion)
	
		
	\Wider{ 
		
		\begin{columns}
			\column{0.05\textwidth}
			\column{0.4\textwidth}
			\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{plots/susy/Feynman_graph_T6bbslepton.pdf}
			
			\begin{itemize}
				\item Model motivated by edge-like ``excess'' observed in Run 1
				\item Features edge-like shape in the \mll distribution
			\end{itemize}
			
			
			\column{0.63\textwidth}
				\vspace{-0.75cm}
				\begin{itemize}
					\item Events with at least two jets and \ptmiss and \mttwol
					\item Very significant contribution from \ttbar events
					\item Naive Bayes classifier to select \ttbar-like and not \ttbar-like
				\end{itemize}
			
				\vspace{-0.3cm}
							
				\hspace{2.5cm}\includegraphics[width=0.65\textwidth]{plots/susy/nLLStandard-SignalInclusiveHighMT2-nLLPlot-norm_SF.pdf}
				
				
			\column{0.05\textwidth}
			

		\end{columns}
		
	}
	
	
	
\end{frame}




\begin{frame}{Search for an edge} 

	\Wider{ 
	\begin{columns}[onlytextwidth]
		\column{0.68\textwidth} 
		
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Regions with/without \PQb-tagged jets and \ttbar/non-\ttbar like
			\item Exploring the \mll distribution for different edge positions
		\end{itemize}

					\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{plots/susy/results/offz/edgeOverview_oneOrMoreBJets.pdf}
		\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{plots/susy/results/offz/edgeOverview_zeroBJets.pdf}
		


		\column{0.35\textwidth} 
			\vspace{-0.8cm}
			
		\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{plots/susy/results/LimitPlot_T6bbllslepton.pdf}	
		
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Good agreement with SM processes
			\item Excluding sbottom masses up to 1.2-1.6 TeV
			\item Exclusion reach extended by 300 \GeV
		\end{itemize}

	

	\end{columns}


}

\end{frame}


\placelogotrue


\section[Higgs physics]{Measurement of \ttH and \tHq production in the multilepton channel}
\subsection{title}


\begin{frame}{} 


\begin{center}
	\begin{large}
		Section 4\\ \vspace{6pt}
		Measurement of the \ttH and \tHq production in the multilepton channel
	\end{large}
\end{center}

\begin{center}
	\includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth]{figs/display_tth.png}
\end{center}

\vspace{-0.1cm}

\begin{itemize}
	\item \ttH multilepton [2016]. JHEP 08 (2018) 066
	\item \ttH combination [2016]. PRL 120, 231801 (2018) $\Leftarrow$ \textbf{\green{Observation}}
	\item \ttH multilepton [2016+2017]. CMS-PAS-HIG-18-019
	\item \blue{\ttH multilepton [Run 2]. CMS-PAS-HIG-19-008}
\end{itemize}

	\Put(-30,280){ \rotatebox{30}{\includegraphics[width=0.44\textwidth]{figs/ttH_briefing.png}}}

\end{frame}



\begin{frame}{Higgs physics}
\Wider{ 
	\begin{columns}
		\column{0.55\textwidth} 

			\begin{itemize}
				\item Discovery of Higgs boson in 2012 
				\item Study of its properties is ongoing
				\item Run 2 allowed to observe its interaction to all third generation particles
			\end{itemize}
		
			\begin{itemize}
				\item Studying the Higgs Yukawa interaction with the top quark
			\end{itemize}
			


		\column{0.45\textwidth} 
			\begin{overpic}[width=\textwidth]{figs/Figure_014-b.pdf}
				\put(33,82){\footnotesize arXiv:2009.04363}
			\end{overpic} 

	\end{columns}
}
	% contexto general de las medidas de Higgs
	%    descubrimiento (spin?)
	%    medida de couplings, mencionar tambien el Hmm, pero todos
	%    explicar que esta tesis ha hecho todos los resultados con run 2 
	%    aqui muestro la culminacion

\end{frame}


\placelogofalse

\begin{frame}{Top quark-Higgs boson interaction}
	
	\Wider{ 
	\begin{columns}[onlytextwidth]
		\column{0.6\textwidth} 
				\vspace{-0.2cm}
		
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Gluon fusion Higgs production and $\PH\to\PGg\PGg$ decays sensitive to it - through loops
			\item \ttH best process to study at tree level
		\end{itemize}
		
		\vspace{-1.0cm}
		
		\begin{center}
			\includegraphics[width=1.04\textwidth]{figs/SigmaNew_v0}
		\end{center}

		\column{0.02\textwidth}

		\column{0.4\textwidth}
		
				\vspace{-0.9cm}
		
	\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{plots/higgs/gluonfusion.pdf}
				
	\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{plots/higgs/tth.pdf}

		\vspace{-0.1cm}

		\begin{itemize}
			\item Challenging process to study
			\item $\sigma_{\PQt\PAQt\PH} \simeq 0.5$ pb 
			\item Sensitive to CP violation in the Yukawa sector
			\item Potentially sensitive to the trilinear Higgs coupling
		\end{itemize}
		
		
	\end{columns}
	
	% explicar que el top yukawa solo se mide en loops de Hgg
	% que es necesario medirlo en ttH, donde esta a tree level
	% tambien es interesante porque es afectado por el trilinear copuling y cp violation
}
		
	
	

\end{frame}

	\placelogotrue

\begin{frame}{ {\normalfont \tHq} production} 
	% explicar tH production, interferencia y tal
	
	
		\begin{columns}
			\column{0.4\textwidth} 
			
				\begin{itemize}
					\item \tHq even more challenging
					\item $\sigma_{\PQt\PH} \simeq$ 70 fb
				\end{itemize}
			

			
				\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/Plot_Escan_H125_new_sqrt.pdf}
				
			\column{0.01\textwidth} 
			\column{0.6\textwidth} 
				\begin{columns}
					\column{0.6\textwidth} 
					\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/tHq_1.png}
					\column{0.6\textwidth} 
					\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/tHq_2.png}
					
					\column{0.05\textwidth} 
				\end{columns}
			
				
				\begin{itemize}
					\item Three production modes: $t$-, $s$- and $\PQt\PW$-channel
					\item $y_{\PQt}$ and $g_{\PW}$-proportional diagrams interfere destructively in the SM
					\item $\kappa_{\PQt}/\kappa_{\PW} = -1$ enhances cross section by a factor of 10 (ITC)
					\item ITC does not affect the \ttH production rate
				\end{itemize}
				
				\column{0.01\textwidth} 
				
			\end{columns}

\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Decay modes} 
	
	\begin{columns}

				
		\column{0.7\textwidth} 
	
	\begin{itemize}
		\item Processes can be studied in different Higgs decays: 
	\end{itemize}

	
	\blue{$\PH\to\PGg\PGg$}
	
	\begin{itemize}
		\item Low branching ratio
		\item Clean final state
		\item Higgs system can be reconstructed
	\end{itemize}

	\blue{$\PH\to\PAQb\PQb$}

	\begin{itemize}
		\item High branching ratio
		\item Large background contribution
	\end{itemize}

	\blue{Multilepton: $\PH\to\PW\PW/\PZ\PZ/\PGt\PGt$}

	\begin{itemize}
		\item Moderate branching ratio
		\item Moderate background contribution
	\end{itemize}

		\column{0.3\textwidth} 
		
		\vspace{0.8cm}
		
		\hspace{-3cm} \includegraphics[width=1.6\textwidth]{figs/{SMHiggsBR.YR4-square}.pdf}

		
	\end{columns}

	% available decay modes
\end{frame}

\placelogofalse

\begin{frame}{Signal regions} 

	
	\begin{columns}
		\column{0.65\textwidth} 

	\begin{itemize}
		\item Events selected and classified in 10 disjoint signal regions
		\begin{itemize}
			\item According to lepton (\Pe or \PGm) and \tauh multiplicity
			\item Lepton charge consistent with final state
			\item Jet multiplicity consistent with final state
		\end{itemize}

		\item \tlssztau, \tlssotau, \thlztau enlarged to accept \tHq events
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Events with one \PQb-tagged jet and one (forward) light jet are accepted
		\end{itemize}
		\item Different background and signal composition in each region
		\item Regions mostly dominated by background
	\end{itemize}

	\column{0.35\textwidth} 
	
		\vspace{-0.8cm}
	
		\includegraphics[width=1.2\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/yields_ttH.pdf}

				\vspace{-0.2cm}
		
		\includegraphics[width=1.2\textwidth]{figs/channels_higgs.pdf}

	\column{0.01\textwidth} 

	\end{columns}

	% descripcion general de las regiones de señal
\end{frame}


\placelogotrue

\begin{frame}{Multivariate classifiers}
		% background discrimination (DNNs)

		\blue{Usage of MVA classifiers}:
		
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Obtain regions pure in signal
			\item Regions pure in background $\Rightarrow$ constrain them
			\item Necessary to separate the different signals
		\end{itemize}
	

		\blue{Input variables}:
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Careful study of the input variables
			\item Optimized separately for each region
		\end{itemize}
		
		
		\begin{itemize}
			\item 3-momenta of leptons, jets and \tauh's
			\item Invariant masses, angular distances, object multiplicities
			\item Taggers to identify top quark and Higgs decay products
		\end{itemize}
	
	

				
				
\end{frame}



\begin{frame}{Multivariate classifiers}
\Wider{ 
	
	\vspace{0.4cm}
	
	\begin{itemize}
		\item Significant evolution during the different Run 2 analyses
	\end{itemize}

	\begin{columns}[onlytextwidth]
	
	\column{0.6\textwidth} 

	\vspace{-1.8cm}

	\onslide<1>{	
		
		
	\blue{\tlssztau, \tlssotau, \thlztau regions}
	
	\begin{itemize}
		\item Multiclass DNNs to separate \ttH, \tHq and backgrounds
		\item Discriminate different backgrounds and different signals simultaneously
		\item Categories built on the DNN scores and event topology
	\end{itemize}
	}

	\onslide<2>{
	\blue{Other regions}
	
	\begin{itemize}
		\item No sensitivity expected for \tHq
		\item Not enough statistics for a multiclass approach
		\item Classifying according to a BDT score
	\end{itemize}
	}	
	\column{0.4\textwidth} 

			\begin{overlayarea}{\textwidth}{\textheight}
				\only<1>{\includegraphics[width=1.1\textwidth]{figs/yields_ttH_maincats.pdf}}
				
				\only<2>{\includegraphics[width=1.1\textwidth]{figs/yields_ttH_othercats.pdf}}
			\end{overlayarea}
	
	\end{columns}
}

\end{frame}


\begin{frame}{DNN subclassification}

	\vspace{0.3cm}
	
	\Wider{ 
		


	\begin{overpic}[width=1.02\textwidth]{figs/ttH_classification.pdf}
		\put(79.5,42.5){\tlssotau}
		\put(3,22){\thlztau}
		\put(3,39.25){\tlssztau}
		
		\put(24,42){\ttH-like}
		\put(24,35){$\PQt\PH\PQq$-like}
		\put(38,42){\ttW-like}
		\put(38,35){Other}
		\put(62,42){$\Pe\Pe$}
		\put(62,39){$\Pe\PGm$}
		\put(62,35){$\PGm\PGm$}
		
		\put(24,29){\ttH-like}
		\put(24,24){$\PQt\PH\PQq$-like}
		\put(24,17){Other}
		\put(45,29){$n_{\PQb \text{jet}}<2$}
		\put(45,24){$n_{\PQb \text{jet}}\geq2$}
		\put(44.5,19){$n_{\PQb \text{jet}}<2$, $n_{\PQb \text{jet}}\geq2$}
		\put(44.5,14){$\PGm\PGm\PGm$, $\PGm\PGm\Pe$, $\PGm\Pe\Pe$, $\Pe\Pe\Pe$}
		
		\put(71.5,35){\ttH-like}
		\put(89.5,35){$\PQt\PH\PQq$-like}
		\put(82,29){Other}
		
		\put(43,8.5){Other regions}
		\put(44,1.5){BDT score}
	\end{overpic} 

}
	

\end{frame}


\begin{frame}{Backgrounds}
	
	\begin{itemize}
		\item Backgrounds dominate in all signal regions
		\item Their estimation is key
	\end{itemize}

	\onslide<1>{
		\blue{Reducible backgrounds} due to 
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Non-prompt leptons and misidentified \tauh \tikzmark{start}
			\item Electron charge flips \tikzmark{end} 
			\item Photon conversions \tikzmark{start2} \tikzmark{end2}
		\end{itemize}
		
		
		\begin{tikzpicture}[remember picture,overlay]
		\draw[decorate,decoration={calligraphic brace}]
		([yshift=10pt,xshift=95pt]{{pic cs:end}|-{pic cs:start}}) --
		node[xshift=5pt,anchor=west, text width=0.45\textwidth] {Estimated with data-driven\\methods}
		([xshift=95pt]{pic cs:end})
		;
		\draw[decorate,decoration={calligraphic brace}]
		([yshift=10pt,xshift=95pt]{{pic cs:end2}|-{pic cs:start2}}) --
		node[xshift=5pt,anchor=west, text width=0.45\textwidth] {Estimated with simulations}
		([xshift=95pt]{pic cs:end2})
		;
		\end{tikzpicture}
	}
	
	
	\onslide<2>{
		\blue{Irreducible backgrounds} due to 
		
		
		\begin{itemize}
			\item \ttZ, \ttW 
			\item Less importantly, WZ, ZZ, rares (tZq, \tttt, ...)
			\item \ttbar and DY events are also irreducible in the \olotau and \zlttau categories
			\item Estimated using state-of-the-art MC simulations and normalized to the more precise theory calculations
		\end{itemize}
	}
	
	


	% explicar los fondos en general
\end{frame}

\placelogofalse

\begin{frame}{Non-prompt leptons}

	\Wider{ 


	\begin{columns}[onlytextwidth]
		\column{0.4\textwidth} 
		
		\vspace{-0.25cm}
		
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Largely suppressed with the usage of MVA techniques
			\item BDT trained to discriminate prompt and non-prompt leptons
		\end{itemize}
	
		\blue{Input variables}
	
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Selection of low level input variables
			\item IP, deep jet, isolation variables
		\end{itemize}
	
	
		


		\column{0.35\textwidth}
		
		
		
		\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{plots/muon/rocs-mu.pdf}

		\column{0.28\textwidth}

		
        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{plots/muon/muon_pt_2018.pdf}			
        
        
	
	\end{columns}

	
}

		\blue{Lepton characterization}

\begin{itemize}
	\item Important to precisely calibrate selected leptons
	\item Efficiency measured in $\PZ\to\Plpm\Plmp$ events
	\item Extrapolation uncertainty evaluated in \ttbar events
\end{itemize}

	% non-propmt leptons	
		% lepton mva, medida in-situ, medida del fake rate
\end{frame}

\placelogofalse


\begin{frame}{Fake rate-measurement}
	\Wider{

	\begin{columns}

		\column{0.01\textwidth} 
		
		\column{0.55\textwidth} 

	\vspace{-2.25cm}

	\begin{itemize}
		\item Fake rate is measured in multijet events
		\item Fit is performed to $m_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{fix}}$ variable to extract fake rate
		\item Parameterized as a function of cone-\pt
	\end{itemize}

		\column{0.55\textwidth} 

		\hspace{-0.5cm}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{figs/Figure_004-a_preliminary.pdf}
		\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{figs/Figure_004-b_preliminary.pdf}
		
%		\column{0.02\textwidth} 
		
		
	\end{columns}

	\begin{columns}
		
	\column{0.52\textwidth} 
	
	\vspace{-2.1cm}
	
	\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{figs/Figure_005-a_preliminary.pdf}
	\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{figs/Figure_005-b_preliminary.pdf}
	
	\column{0.58\textwidth} 
	
	\begin{itemize}
		\item FR may vary between multijet and \ttbar events
		\item Difference checked on \ttbar simulations 
		\item Very good closure for muons, acceptable for electrons
	\end{itemize}		
		
	\end{columns}
		
		
}

\end{frame}


\begin{frame}{Irreducible backgrounds}


\begin{columns}
	\column{0.5\textwidth} 

	\vspace{-0.2cm}
		
	\onslide<1>{
		
			\blue{Normalization}
		
		\begin{itemize}
			\item \ttZ and \ttW normalization are determined in the signal extraction fit
			\begin{itemize}
				\item No assumption made on the total cross section
			\end{itemize}
			\item Dedicated control region for \ttZ 
			\begin{itemize}
				\item 3\Pl with a \PZ boson candidate
				\item 4\Pl with a \PZ boson candidate
			\end{itemize}
			\item Dedicated \ttW category in the \tlssztau, built with the DNN score
		\end{itemize}
	}
	

	
	\column{0.3\textwidth} 
	
	
	\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_011-a_preliminary.pdf}
	
	\column{0.3\textwidth} 
	
	\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_011-b_preliminary.pdf}
	
	

	
\end{columns}

	\vspace{0.2cm}

	\onslide<2>{
	
	\blue{Acceptance and shapes}
	
	\begin{itemize}
		\item \ttZ and \ttH simulated at NLO QCD accuracy
		\item \tHq simulated at LO 
	\end{itemize} 
}


\end{frame}



\placelogotrue

\begin{frame}{{\normalfont \ttW} modeling}

	\begin{itemize}
		\item Modeling of \ttW  is challenging
		\item Process usually observed consistently higher than SM expectation
		\begin{itemize}
			\item {\footnotesize ATLAS-CONF-2019-045, JHEP 08 (2018) 011  }
		\end{itemize}
	\end{itemize}


	\begin{itemize}
		\item Subleading electroweak corrections found to be significant
		\item \blue{\ttW simulated at NLO QCD, including $\alpha^3$ and $\alpha^3\alpha_s$ corrections}
	\end{itemize}
	
			
	
	\vspace{0.2cm}
	
	
	\begin{columns}
	\column{0.7\textwidth}

	
	
	\definecolor{Mycolor2}{HTML}{B85450}
\definecolor{Mycolor1}{HTML}{6C8EBF}
	\begin{overpic}[width=\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/ttw_orders}
		\put(15,25){LO$_1$: $\alpha_s^2\alpha$}
		\put(70,25){LO$_2$: $\alpha^3$}
		\put(1,5){\footnotesize NLO$_1$: $\alpha_s^3\alpha$}
		\put(29,5){\footnotesize NLO$_2$: $\alpha_s^2\alpha^2$}
		\put(53,5){\footnotesize NLO$_3$: $\alpha_s\alpha^3$}
		\put(82,5){\footnotesize NLO$_4$: $\alpha^4$}
		\put(8,17){\footnotesize\color{Mycolor1} \bfseries QCD}
		\put(35,17){\footnotesize \color{Mycolor2} \bfseries QED}
		\put(60,17){\footnotesize\color{Mycolor1} \bfseries QCD}
		\put(87,17){\footnotesize\color{Mycolor2} \bfseries QED}
	\end{overpic} 
	
	\column{0.3\textwidth}
	
	\begin{overpic}[width=\textwidth]{figs/njets_ttw.png}
		\put(20,40){\footnotesize arXiv:2004.09552} 
	\end{overpic}

	\end{columns}

	\vspace{-0.1cm}

	\begin{itemize}
		\item First LHC analysis to implement these corrections at differential level
	\end{itemize}



\end{frame}


\placelogofalse 

\begin{frame}{Results} 
\Wider{ 
	
		

	
	
	\begin{columns}[onlytextwidth]
		
		
			\column{0.75\textwidth} 
			
			\vspace{-0.5cm}
			
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Observed events in some signal categories
			\item Good agreement of data with the model
			\item Clear presence of \ttH signal in the regions
			\item Very pure selection of \ttW background
		\end{itemize}
		
		\begin{columns}[onlytextwidth]
			\column{0.33\textwidth} 
			\begin{overlayarea}{\textwidth}{\textheight}
			\only<1,2>{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_007-a_preliminary.pdf}}
			\only<3>{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_007-a_preliminary_transp.pdf}}
			\end{overlayarea}

			\column{0.33\textwidth} 
			\begin{overlayarea}{\textwidth}{\textheight}
			\only<1,2>{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_008-a_preliminary.pdf}}
			\only<3>{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_008-a_preliminary_transp.pdf}}
			\end{overlayarea}
			
			\column{0.33\textwidth} 
			\begin{overlayarea}{\textwidth}{\textheight}
			\only<1,2>{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_008-d_preliminary.pdf}}
			\only<3>{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_008-d_preliminary_transp.pdf}}
		\end{overlayarea}
		\end{columns}
		
		
			\column{0.22\textwidth} 
									\vspace{-0.7cm}
									
			\begin{overlayarea}{\textwidth}{\textheight}
			\only<1>{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_007-b_preliminary.pdf}}
			\only<2,3>{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_007-b_preliminary_transp.pdf}}
			\end{overlayarea}
						
						\vspace{-3.7cm}
						
						
			\begin{overlayarea}{\textwidth}{\textheight}		\only<1,3>{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_007-c_preliminary.pdf}}
			\only<2>{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_007-c_preliminary_transp.pdf}}
			\end{overlayarea}

		
		
		
	
	\end{columns}
}

% results (los yields)
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Results}

	\vspace{-0.5cm}

	\Wider{ 

	\begin{columns}[onlytextwidth]
		\column{0.38\textwidth} 

		\includegraphics[width=1.02\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_012_preliminary.pdf}
	
		\column{0.01\textwidth} 
	

			\column{0.33\textwidth} 
			
			\begin{block}{}
			
			\begin{itemize}
				\item Data is fitted in all categories
			\end{itemize}
			\end{block}
		

	


		\begin{center}
	\begin{tabular}{ll}
		\toprule 
		Process & Signal strength \\  \midrule 
		\ttH    & $0.92^{+0.26}_{-0.23}$ \\
		\tHq    & $5.7^{+4.1}_{-4.0}$ \\ \midrule 
		\ttZ    & $1.03 \pm 0.14$ \\ 
		\ttW    & $1.43 \pm 0.21$ \\ \bottomrule 
	\end{tabular}
	
\end{center}

\column{0.02\textwidth} 

\column{0.28\textwidth} 

\vspace{-0.15cm}

\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_014-a_preliminary.pdf}

\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_014-b_preliminary.pdf}

		\end{columns}

}

	% 5 sigmas, meter algun likelihood scan? 
\end{frame}

%
\placelogotrue
\begin{frame}{Results}
	
	\begin{columns}
	\column{0.5\textwidth}
	
	\begin{block}{Expected significances}
	\begin{itemize}
	\item Sensitivity to \ttH production $\Rightarrow$ 5.2 $\sigma$ 
	\item Sensitivity to \tHq production $\Rightarrow$ 0.3 $\sigma$ 
	\end{itemize}
	\end{block}	
	
	\begin{block}{Observed significances}
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Observed significance for \ttH production: 4.7 $\sigma$ 
			\item Observed significance for \tHq production: 1.4 $\sigma$ 
		\end{itemize}
	\end{block}	

	\column{0.5\textwidth}
	
	
	\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/scan_ttH.pdf}

\end{columns}


\end{frame}



\begin{frame}{Interpretation} 

	\Wider{ 

	\vspace{0.1cm}

	\begin{columns}[onlytextwidth]



	
	
	\column{0.4\textwidth} 
	
	\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_016-b_preliminary.pdf}	
	
	\column{0.4\textwidth} 
	
	\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_016-a_preliminary.pdf}


	
	
		\end{columns}
}


\begin{itemize}
	\item Interpretation of yields in terms of $\kappa_{\PQt}$ and $\kappa_{\PV}$
	\item Best fit consistent with the SM expectation
	\item \blue{$\kappa_{\PQt}$ constrained to be within $-0.9 < \kappa_{\PQt} < -0.7$ or $0.7 < \kappa_{\PQt} < 1.1$  at 95\% C.L.}
\end{itemize}
	% interpretacion en terminos de kt kv 
\end{frame}


\begin{frame}{Prospects for {\normalfont \ttH} measurements }
\Wider{ 
	

	\begin{columns}[onlytextwidth]
	
	\column{0.65\textwidth}		
			
	\blue{Precision measurements of the top Yukawa interaction}
	\begin{itemize}
		\item Combination with other decay modes
		\item Dedicated \ttW studies and measurements
		\item Increased precision with higher luminosity
	\end{itemize}
	
	
	\blue{CP violation in top Yukawa sector}
	

	
		
		
	\begin{itemize}
		\item Still allowed by experimental data {\footnotesize (EPJ C 75 (2015) 6, 267)} 
	\end{itemize}
	\[
		\mathcal{L} = \bar{\psi_{\PQt}} \left( \cos(\alpha) \kappa_{\PH\PQt\PQt}   + i\sin(\alpha) \kappa_{\mathrm{A}\PQt\PQt} \gamma^5 \right)\frac{y_{\PQt}}{\sqrt{2}} \psi_{\PQt} \phi
	\]
	
		\vspace{-0.3cm}
	
	\begin{itemize}
			\item Highly disfavored by $\ttH(\to\PGg\PGg)$, sensitivity can be gained with multilepton channel 
	\end{itemize}

	\column{0.35\textwidth}
		
		
	\includegraphics[width=1.05\textwidth]{plots/higgs/higgs_cp_violation.pdf}
	
	\end{columns}
	

	
	
	

}
\end{frame}


\begin{frame}{Prospects for {\normalfont \ttH} measurements }
\Wider{ 


	\begin{columns}[onlytextwidth]

	\column{0.5\textwidth} 
	
		\blue{Differential measurements, EFT interpretations}
		
		
	\begin{itemize}
		\item Differential \ttH measurements could bring sensitivity to $\lambda_3$ {\footnotesize (EPJ C 77 (2017) 12, 887)}`
		\item Measurements in tails of distributions can be interpreted in terms of constrains on EFTs {\footnotesize (JHEP~10~(2016)~123)}
	\end{itemize}


	\column{0.5\textwidth} 
	\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{plots/higgs/kappal_ttH_hpt.pdf}
	

	
\end{columns}

}


\end{frame}


\AtBeginSection{\frame{\sectionpage}}
\placelogotrue

\section{Conclusions}
\subsection{title}

\begin{frame}{Conclusions}

	\begin{itemize}
		\item Study of pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV during the Run 2 of the LHC collected with CMS
		\item Focusing in processes with high \pt leptons in the final state
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Allows to explore a wide range of physics observables			\item Characteristic experimental signature
		\end{itemize}
		\item Strong contributions to the \blue{trigger and lepton reconstruction} 
		\item Developments made increase the precision of the physics analyses performed in this thesis
	\end{itemize}




\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Conclusions} 

	\begin{itemize}
	\item Precision measurements of \tW production are crucial for \ttbar production measurements 
	\begin{itemize}
		\item Together with \ttbar production, relevant for BSM searches
	\end{itemize}
	\item \blue{Inclusive cross section measured to be compatible} with state-of-the-art calculations
	\[
	\blue{\sigma_{\PQt\PW} = 63.1 \pm 1.8\ \mathrm{(stat)} \pm 6.3\ \mathrm{(syst)} \pm 2.1\ \mathrm{(lumi)}\ \mathrm{pb}}
	\]
	\item \blue{Differential cross section} measured as a function of variables of interest
	\begin{itemize}
		\item Consistent with the reference generators used in CMS
	\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}




\end{frame}



\begin{frame}{Conclusions}

	\begin{itemize}
		\item \blue{Searched for SUSY } in events with an opposite-sign same-flavor lepton pair
		\begin{itemize}
			\item Using the complete Run 2 dataset
		\end{itemize}
		\item Signal regions built targeting different production modes
		\item Developed data-driven background estimation methods suitable for the search
		\item Results observed are  \blue{consistent with the SM expectations}
		\item Upper limits on sparticle production cross section are set
	\end{itemize}

	\begin{itemize}
		\item \blue{Exclusion limits are extended} by hundreds of GeV \blue{with respect to previous searches}
		\item Results of the search will be \blue{combined with other electroweak SUSY searches}
	\end{itemize}


	

\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Conclusions}
	\begin{itemize}
	\item \ttH and \tHq production rates have been measured in the multilepton channel
	\begin{itemize}
		\item Using the complete Run 2 dataset
	\end{itemize}
	\item \blue{Signal strengths are compatible with the SM expectation}
	\[
	\blue{\r_{\ttH} = 0.92 \pm 0.19 \stat ^{+0.17}_{-0.13}\systlumi}
	\]
	\[
		\blue{\r_{\tHq} = 5.7 \pm 2.7 \stat\pm 3.0\systlumi}
	\]
	\item Observed (expected) significance of 4.7 (5.2)  $\sigma$ for \ttH production
	\item Results constrain the top-Higgs coupling modifier to be within $-0.9 < \kappa_{\PQt} < -0.7$ or $0.7 < \kappa_{\PQt} < 1.1$ 
	\end{itemize}
\end{frame}


\begin{frame}{}

	\includegraphics[width=0.75\textwidth]{plots/gant.pdf}

\end{frame}


\miniframesoff

\begin{frame}{} 

{\Huge Back-up} 

\end{frame}


\begin{frame}{Results}

\blue{\tlssztau}

\includegraphics[width=0.24\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_007-a_preliminary.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.24\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_007-b_preliminary.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.24\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_007-c_preliminary.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.24\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_007-d_preliminary.pdf}

\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Results}

\blue{\thlztau and \tlssotau}

\includegraphics[width=0.24\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_008-a_preliminary.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.24\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_008-b_preliminary.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.24\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_008-c_preliminary.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.24\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_008-d_preliminary.pdf}

\end{frame}


\begin{frame}{Results}

\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.2\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_009-a_preliminary.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.2\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_009-b_preliminary.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.2\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_009-c_preliminary.pdf}


\includegraphics[width=0.2\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_010-a_preliminary.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.2\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_010-b_preliminary.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.2\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_010-c_preliminary.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.2\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_010-d_preliminary.pdf}

\end{center}

\end{frame}


\begin{frame}{Irreducible backgrounds} 
\Wider{ 
\begin{itemize}
\item Signals, \ttZ and \ttW normalization are freely floating 
\begin{itemize}
\item No assumption on total cross section
\end{itemize} 
\item Modeling of irreducible processes follows the most accurate calculations available
\end{itemize}

\blue{\ttH and \ttZ production}
\begin{itemize}
\item Generated at NLO QCD with \MGvATNLO
\item Normalized NLO QCD+EWK (\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.07922}{arXiv:1610.07922})
\end{itemize}

\blue{$\PQt\PH\PQq$ and $\PQt\PH\PW$}
\begin{itemize}
\item Generated at LO with \MGvATNLO
\item Normalized at NLO QCD (\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.07922}{arXiv:1610.07922})
\end{itemize}


\blue{\ttW production}
\begin{itemize}
\item Generated at NLO QCD with \MGvATNLO
\begin{itemize}
\item Normalized to NLO QCD + EWK  (\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.07922}{arXiv:1610.07922})
\end{itemize}
\item $\alpha^3$ and $\alpha_s\alpha^3$ corrections are added on top (\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.09552}{arXiv:2004.09552})
\end{itemize}




% irreducible backgrounds (con un focus en ttW)
}
\end{frame}


\begin{frame}{2D likelihood scans}


\includegraphics[width=0.24\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_014-a_preliminary.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.24\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_014-b_preliminary.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.24\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_014-c_preliminary.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.24\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/Figure_014-d_preliminary.pdf}

\end{frame}


\begin{frame}{Systematic uncertainties} 

\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/table_backup.png}

\end{frame}


\begin{frame}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/tabla1.png}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}
\includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/tabla2.png}
\end{frame}


\begin{frame}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/tabla3.png}
\end{frame}


\begin{frame}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/tabla4.png}
\end{frame}


\begin{frame}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/ICHEP_talk/tabla5.png}
\end{frame}

\end{document}

\end{document}